Bank A × Bank B — Cross-bank migration

Customer migration - seamless banking transition

Following Bank B’s acquisition of Bank A, 5 million retail and business customers needed to be migrated safely from Bank A’s digital platform to Bank B’s - with no disruption to account access and no loss of trust. I led the UX design of the migration journey, including the OIDC handoff flow, maintenance states, and special use case journeys.

MY ROLE

Lead UX / Product designer

scale

5 million customers

platform

iOS, Android,
online bankng

status

Defined for delivery -
live Q2 2027

Impact

Impact at a glance

5m

Customers being migrated

2 banks

One seamless customer journey

4

Distinct customer states designed for

Q2 2027

Target go-live

01

My role

Design leadership across non-standard customer journeys

Design lead

Led UX design for Bank A's side - login entry points, redirect screens, maintenance banners, and transition states up to the OIDC handoff

Special use cases

Designed bespoke journeys for Power of Attorney accounts, dual-banked customers, and read-only business users

Cross-org collaboration

Weekly design sessions with Bank B's team via a shared Figma file, aligning both sides of the flow

AI as a thinking partner

Used AI to map flow logic, pressure-test edge cases, and make sense of the OIDC authentication architecture - translating technical complexity into UX decisions

02

Problem

How do you move 5 million people between banks without them noticing?

If these scenarios were pushed into exceptions or support processes, the product would feel unreliable exactly when customers needed clarity most. The challenge was to make complex access rules visible without making the mainstream journey feel heavy.

“Early usability testing showed customers didn’t trust the handoff. Being redirected away from your bank during login reads as a scam, not a feature.”

Reframe

From “build an OIDC redirect flow” → “design a handoff that 5 million customers trust enough to complete”

03

The design challenge

Trust at the moment of maximum anxiety

Problem

Trust collapse at the handoff

Usability testing showed customers interpreted the OIDC redirect as suspicious - several participants abandoned the flow entirely, assuming their account had been compromised.

Decision

Transparency over efficiency

We explained what was happening, why, and what to expect next before any redirect occurred - making the transition visible and legible rather than technically seamless. This added a step but eliminated the anxiety causing abandonment.

Problem

Four distinct customer states

The migration API returns four possible outcomes per customer. Each required a distinct journey, all needing to feel consistent despite serving very different situations.

Decision

State-based journey system

We built a consistent component system - banners, redirect screens, confirmation states - configurable per customer state, keeping the experience coherent and simplifying engineering implementation.

04

Special use cases

Three segments that couldn’t follow the standard flow

Power of Attorney

Impossible to distinguish PoA from donor digitally - directed to postal credentials with a clear explanatory screen and fallback guidance.

Dual-banked customers

Customers with accounts at both banks redirected to Bank B login with contextual messaging to avoid credential confusion.

Read-only business users

Bank B has no read-only functionality - redirected to web OIDC flow with clear explanation of what changes post-migration.

05

Cross-org collaboration

Creating one shared product language across two organisations

Two banks, two design teams, two sets of legal and compliance requirements - and one customer experience that needed to feel seamless. Weekly cross-bank design sessions and a shared Figma file kept the seam between both sides of the journey as invisible as possible.

Bank A design team

Login entry points, migration banners, and redirect screens up to the OIDC handoff point

Bank B design team

First-time login setup and onboarding experience post-handoff

06

Success criteria

What good looks like when it goes live

We defined success around confidence, explainability, and operational readiness rather than visual completion alone.

High onboarding success rate

% of migrated customers completing first login on Bank B’s platform, tracked across retail and business

Low drop-off at OIDC handoff

The point usability testing flagged as highest risk - monitored per migration wave

Vulnerable customer journeys protected

PoA and under-19 onboarding tracked separately, in line with Consumer Duty requirements

Sustained activity post-migration

% of customers logging in within 7 and 30 days, confirming substantial engagement

What makes this different

No launch metrics yet - but the complexity is the story. Designing a trusted handoff for 5 million customers across two banks, two design systems, and four distinct customer states is a different kind of problem to a single product journey.

Thanks for taking the time.

If you'd like to talk through my work, I'd love to hear from you.